Prompted by Anna’s comment to my last post, I did a little research and it turns out that there really is a freaking waterfall under the Brooklyn Bridge. It’s an exhibit running only this summer set up by the Public Art Fund of New York. And I was not joking in my last post, I really had NO IDEA this existed! The page I found with the water taxi info doesn’t even mention it!
For other uninformed people like me, the project consists of four man-made waterfalls of monumental scale, on display on the shores of the New York waterfront: one on the Brooklyn anchorage of the Brooklyn Bridge; one on the Brooklyn Piers, one in Lower Manhattan at Pier 35 north of the Manhattan Bridge; and one on the north shore of Governors Island. They operate from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily, and are lit after sunset. You can read more about it on the official website.
HOWEVER, I still insist that the Water Taxi photo in my last post is a PHONY, because the damn thing doesn’t really look like that! One reader said that from any view, you ALWAYS see the scaffolding. Here are some REAL photos (NOT digitally retouched) that I think give the viewer a clearer understanding:


I’m all for public art and stuff…but COME ON. Water cascading from scaffolding? REALLY? I just don’t know. And the Brooklyn Bridge one is the best of the four– at least it’s backed up against the anchorage of the bridge. The others are just freestanding scaffolding:


After perusing some reader comments from all over the web about this exhibit, I’ve pasted some of my favorites from people on both sides of the argument for your reading pleasure:
*******************************************************************************************************
“I mean this may be the dumbest thing I have ever seen. Why not take a drive upstate and see some real nature? If you have no car then maybe a bus? I mean fake waterfalls in Manhattan? If you are actually impressed by these than it means you really need to get out of the city and see some real nature. And we wonder why our economy is so bad?” –posted by Jcap on NYT.
“Yes, God forbid we have something to take our minds off the depressing economic environment. Enjoy spending your free time staring and your empty wallet and worrying. I’ll be out walking along the river enjoying some privately funded art/distraction.”
“The best things in life are free. You’re in NYC, one of the most exciting cities in the world. You can always find something fun to do that costs little to nothing. If you’re so jaded that everything in NYC bores you, this isn’t going to help. ”
“I find the complaints bizarre. The point is an “urban” waterfall — something that is, yes, artificial and constructed, but meant to evoke something greater in nature, to bring it into contrast with the city landscape. Are there the same complaints about urban parks? Why take a stroll there when you can hike in the woods? It’s not meant to be the same experience. Just think for a moment. I certainly do wish I was in NYC again to see this. “- Posted by Gloria on NYT.
*********************************************************************************************************
I LOVE a good public debate! And if you’re wondering, the funding is both public and private- Public Art Fund is a non-profit organization with generous private donors, but also receives some funds from the National Endowment for the Arts- a pittance, I’m sure, but tax dollars nonetheless. Other lazy blog commenters think the dirty East River water might be a health hazard when the wind kicks up the mist– FYI, the water is filtered before it comes out the waterfall.
Anyone care to share their thoughts? Personally, I’m on the fence. Fake waterfalls: beautiful and thought-provoking artistic expression that gives residents and tourists something new to enjoy? OR colossal waste of time and money that could be going to helping third-world nations? DISCUSS.
Recent Comments